<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tracy&#039;s E-learning and Digital Cultures Blog &#187; final assessment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalculture-ed.net/tracys/tag/final-assessment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalculture-ed.net/tracys</link>
	<description>Part of the MSc in E-learning at the University of Edinburgh</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 16:41:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Week 10 summary: embracing the uncanny</title>
		<link>http://digitalculture-ed.net/tracys/2009/12/12/week-10-summary/</link>
		<comments>http://digitalculture-ed.net/tracys/2009/12/12/week-10-summary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 16:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tracy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[assignment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critical perspectives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lifestreaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bayne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[final assessment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Usher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[week 10 summary]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalculture-ed.net/tracys/?p=189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This entry is part 10 of 12 in the series weekly summaries
Our new pedagogies may be uncanny but it was with a sigh of relief I returned to the familiar realm of education.  The jaunt through cultural studies has been extremely interesting, but I was getting a little lost without a peg to hang it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="seriesmeta">This entry is part 10 of 12 in the series <a href="http://digitalculture-ed.net/tracys/series/weekly-summaries/" id="series-110" title="weekly summaries">weekly summaries</a></div><p><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-190" src="http://digitalculture-ed.net/tracys/files/2009/12/uncanny-185x300.jpg" alt="uncanny" width="185" height="300" /></p>
<p>Our new pedagogies may be uncanny but it was with a sigh of relief I returned to the familiar realm of education.  The jaunt through cultural studies has been extremely interesting, but I was getting a little lost without a peg to hang it all on.  It was the readings for this block (especially Bayne and Usher) that made everything fit into place.</p>
<p>I understand the dislocation of online learning, and it is the strangeness that draws me.  I find it liberating &#8211; the lack of fixed rules that melt away with the disappearance of classroom walls and chalkboards.  I am interested how this uncanny nature disconcerts some and exhilarates others.  I have never been convinced the the native / immigrant divide that we explored way back in the days of IDEL &#8211; if it is that simple then why do I feel so at home in this virtual world, when I didn&#8217;t have an email address until my boss begged me to get one in 1997 (the same guy who took me shopping to buy my first computer in 2000 &#8211; I think he knew I would never get my Dip TESOL finished without one)?  As I was pondering these issues I kept coming back to Bayne&#8217;s paper on smooth and striated learning spaces, which we studied in the Course Design module.  Maybe a posthuman student (and indeed teacher) must be a little in love with chaos, and strange learning.  We have to get comfortable with alternate democratic sources of knowledge.  I remember when it was announced (on the internet of course) that Wikipedia was as reliable as the Encyclopedia Britannica &#8211; I have no idea if it was true and no intention of researching it&#8217;s veracity &#8211; other than googling it (<a href="http://news.cnet.com/2100-1038_3-5997332.html">here, see? 2005 &#8211; it must be EVEN more accurate now</a>) but I got a thrill of smug vindication when I first read it.  Maybe this is what makes us cyborgs &#8211; becoming posthuman is a leap of faith, not technology.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">
<p>Bayne, S. (2004). Smoothness and striation in digital learning spaces. <em>E-learning</em> 1(2): pp. 302-316.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">Bayne, S. (forthcoming, March 2010). <a href="http://www.education.ed.ac.uk/on-line_campus/e-learning/library/edc/bayne2009.pdf">Academetron, automaton, phantom: uncanny digital pedagogies</a>. <em>London Review of Education</em>. [revised version uploaded 10 November 09]</p>
<p style="text-align: left">Usher, R. and Edwards, R. (1998). <a href="http://www.education.ed.ac.uk/on-line_campus/e-learning/library/edc/usher_edwards1998.pdf">Lost and found: ‘cyberspace’ and the (dis)location of teaching, learning and research</a>. SCUTREA 1998, Exeter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://digitalculture-ed.net/tracys/2009/12/12/week-10-summary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<series:name><![CDATA[weekly summaries]]></series:name>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

