Archive for the ‘Assessment’ Category

In conclusion…

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010

Early thoughts on the course structure were often of distraction, frustration and the urge to ‘throw in the towel’ which had to be resisted.

“I’m not yet sure that my Lifestream will eventually portray an objective picture of my involvement with digital culture and I don’t see lifestreaming as a mash-up … but I’m willing to give it a decent try.” Bill Babouris Blog entry 30/09/09

Many battled with the technology but swift intervention by tutors helped, though more in-depth textual support at the outset in the course guides would have been useful, with screenshots to help the less technologically-advanced students.

Using the lifestream to assess strangeness is to demonstrate the disjointed and spectral nature of our studies, and the lack of boundaries was noted:

@damiendebarra working with barriers can be comforting as well as restrictive. total freedom can be a scary place!” @sarahp 22/09/09

However, collating  these resources in the lifestream creates the familiarity that Bayne seeks to avoid.  It may demonstrate the “learning process as volatile, disorientating and invigorating” (Bayne, 2010: pg 8), but surely putting everything together gives us as learners our own VLE?

Having completed the course I would have to state emphatically that I believe this course has succeeded in demonstrating discomfort as a learning method. This has been the most challenging, infuriating and ultimately rewarding course of study that I have ever undertaken.

“Predictability and certainty become less the norm and paralogy, or the acceptance of dissensus and conflict in what constitutes knowledge, is more readily seen as a positive value” (Usher 1998: pg1)

When something is strange and disjointed I believe that you intensify your focus to make sense of it. It is in man’s nature to impose order on the world, to find patterns, as he regards the stars and reforms them into the image of gods. This takes imagination and deliberation and what Usher calls “multi-disciplinarity, multi-literacies and transcoding, and ‘imaginative’ skills to gather information and connecting it together in new ways” (pg 1)

The uncanny allows us to manipulate existing and accepted knowledge to create new knowledge.

References Used

The theory of uncanny pedagogies and how one online course is attempting to use technology to promote discomforted learning. By Sarah Payne

Saturday, January 2nd, 2010

This piece is designed to supply the reader with a beginning and an end – but the route taken on this journey is decided by the reader.

The design pays homage to Kress and allows me to use new technologies to address “the relative power of author or reader” (2005: pg9). In conventional essays the reader is passive – following a path set by the author. Here I give control to the reader and allow them to choose their own path.

The topic is the uncanny nature of learning and specifically with reference to this course; the uncanny nature of the delivery should match the uncanny nature of the subject matter.

Introduction

As new media technologies become more part of everyday life, consumers experience a new type of reality that can be far removed from their lived existence.

“Ubiquitous computing disturbs the sense of physical location, extending and multiplying the body throughout the globe”  (Poster, 2002: pg758)

Poster (2002) argues that information media “transform(s) place and space in such a way that what has been regarded as the locus of the everyday can no longer be distinguished as separate from its opposite” (pg743)

We can no longer discern what is real.  The act of engaging in a new reality, for example, recreating a facet of personality in a personal journal (or blog), can blur the lines between reality and unreality. The author writes, and the creation can be “unapologetically confessional, a space where the self is carefully and painstakingly constructed and consumed”  (Bryson, 2008 :pg801) but it can be ‘consumed’ and manipulated by anyone else.

“Reliance on the familiar distinction between the public and the private becomes no longer possible, fundamentally upsetting the markers of freedom in each domain.” (Poster, 2002: Pg758)

This is a new experience for many. The digital narrative that individuals now inhabit online can be a strange, unstable and frenetic place.

“It is no doubt the case that when we work in internet environments, we work with technological spaces which are highly volatile, and which offer us new and potentially radical ways of communicating, representing and constituting knowledge and selfhood.” (Bayne and Ross, 2007: pg1)

This volatility leads us to feel disjointed and distracted – too much is happening and we may struggle to control the “sudden unfamiliarity of our textual and communicative practices (Bayne, 2010: pg2). This ‘uncanniness’ and sense of strangeness that this engenders causes the familiar to feel unfamiliar – we view our own reality in a altered fashion and often we cannot recognise it. In the wired world notions of time and place, the (un)reality of the body, and the source of knowledge is constantly challenged, where previously we have understood their nature.

“Each new reader in the electronic environment can her- or himself become a contributor/designer/writer; the lines between consumer and producer can be transgressed, blurred.”  (Carpenter, 2009: pg140)

This blurring of the lines  is a challenge to educators if they intend to embrace digital culture in academic practices:

“The university, its inhabitants and the project of teaching and learning are being rendered uncanny by the workings of digital technology” (Bayne, 2010: pg1).

This requires a new language/understanding on the part of academics as Usher points out, “Pedagogy can no longer be seen simply as the ‘authoritative’ transmission of canonical bodies of knowledge by research-based ‘experts’.”  (1998: pg1). Learners require more than being fed facts to be memorised and they expect to encounter knowledge using a multitude of methods and technologies:

“Learner-centred approaches are reflected in practices in which the instructor still defines largely what needs to be learned, but how that learning takes place and how it might be represented are things students are increasingly empowered to determine. Learning-centred approaches, finally, acknowledge that the world is changing”  (Brown and Peterson, 2009)

This approach empowers learners to manipulate their own learning, and maybe even the traditional Virtual Learning Environment has become too outmoded to fulfil this requirement.

Confusion

Confusion

Lifestream Summary

Sunday, December 13th, 2009

The lifestream is intended to:

  1. Map (and demonstrate) the path of learning.
  2. Collate the ‘chaos’ of the course.

1) was stated in the course outline.

2) became obvious only once we began the week 10 reading. The design of the course structure was to disorientate us to facilitate a deeper engagement with our own learning. However balance must be maintained between order and chaos – and this is the second (though not secondary) role of the lifestream.

One of the decisions I had to make is how the lifestream should appear. How authentic do I want it? For example, many early items demonstrated a tussle with technology:

Am struggling with twitter and delicious. have added them to my lifestream. doesn’t show reply tweets or any tagged pages. ideas? 22nd September Twitter.

However, I decided they should remain because they demonstrated what we later called the ‘uncanny’ nature of the digital experience. They show the struggles as well as the successes, and we must demonstrate the whole of the journey, not just the highlights where we stopped and took a virtual photograph of the local sights!

I have managed to provide “evidence of new material every day or so” but only at a considerable amount of stress. The problem has been to maintain the quality of material, as well as quantity. When editing the lifestream I have removed many entries not pertinent to the course, deciding if a ‘full’ day with tenuous entries was preferable to a ‘sparse’ day with pertinent content.

The ‘live’ state of the lifestream effectively removed the power to ‘catch up’ and the readings could take a week to complete, so comments I made were often at the end of that week. To manage that I wrote ‘initial thoughts’ entries without having finished the reading, sometimes meaning I was commenting on incomplete understanding, and I was not able to satisfactorily comment on Haraway and cyborgs until I had read the core and secondary reading, but not to remark  would create a definite gap. Conversely, reading back it is interesting to watch my developing understanding at various stages of the reading. For example, the cyborg reading was quite difficult for me:

finding Haraway so frustrating! is it just me or is she a bit ‘whiney’? 11th November Twitter

Nonetheless this is the topic that I posted the most blog entries and comments about. In this case my lifestream truly demonstrates my (sometimes erratic) path of learning.

The lifestream has also acted as a consolidating tool in that it has successfully brought together and maintained all my sources and the differing technologies. As a learner not used to using VLEs, the concept of studying without one was daunting;

Studying without a vle feels like tightrope walking without a safety net! 22nd September Twitter

However, the lifestream meant that I could easily maintain and then re-engage all of the sources I collected as I journeyed through the course.

Without the lifestream this course would not be possible.

Choosing my delivery method and asking – is it sufficiently academic?

Saturday, December 5th, 2009

I have got to the point in my assignment planning that I am beginning to look at the method of delivery because a traditional essay or simple hypertext essay just won’t cut it. However I have concerns that what I am considering will not appear to be sufficiently academic. With these concerns in mind I have been re reading Rick carpenter and Boundary Negotiations: electronic environments as interface.

So what am I planning?

My intention is to create a piece that has an obvious beginning and end, but the path that you travel to get from one to the other is entirely set by the reader, harking back to Kress pg 9 (2005) and allowing me to use new technology to address “the relative power of author or reader” . In a normal essay the reader is relatively passive – following a path that is set by the author. In this case I want to give the control to the reader and allow them to choose their own path. I am restricted in that I need an intro section and a conclusion to tie it all together and give it ’some’ kind of structure, but beyond that I want the reader to explore!

Why let the reader choose?

The topic is the uncanny nature of learning and specifically this course and I want the uncanny nature of the delivery to match the uncanny nature of the subject matter.

Within this bundle of elements woven together, I want to engage different technologies to maintain variety, including using text, video and possibly a small amount of Prezi or something similar. I am still deciding exactly what to use but you get the idea!

Is it considered academic?

Carpenter adequately covers the issues with integrating our “convergent culture” into an academic framework when he states:

“Although popular discourses and genres are no longer denigrated within academia as they once were (or at least not to the same extent), they are not always or entirely welcome either.” Carpenter (2009) pg 139

So moving forward into a more integrated, liberally interpretative academic scenario may prove difficult:

“The logic of digital technology leads us in a new direction,” Neil Kleinman (1996) reminded us. “Objects, as well as ideas, are no longer fixed, no longer tangible […] In this space, stories are written that change with each new reader; new material can be added, and old material deleted. Nothing is permanent” Carpenter (2009) pg 140

It is this loss of author control that Kress deliberates at length.

“Each new reader in the electronic environment can her- or himself become a contributor/designer/writer; the lines between consumer and producer can be transgressed, blurred.” Carpenter (2009) pg 140

It is possible that such fluidity of nature is unnatural for educators – and therefore it makes them uncomfortable. The argument could well be considered as ‘If nothing is permanent, how can it be assessed? And if it cannot be assessed how can it be academically significant?’

maura.person-studying

References

Rick carpenter:  Boundary Negotiations: electronic environments as interface

Gunther Kress:  Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge, and learning

Another assignment proposal

Thursday, December 3rd, 2009

As we appear to be sharing our assignment ideas – here is mine (though still at an early stage as I am still working on my lifestream)

I have been really inspired by this last block (now that we have moved away from Haraway!!!) and I have been able to see the thinking  behind the innovative structure of this course (which I have to say I have found immensely challenging, interesting and rewarding).


So this is an outline of my thoughts so far (including some ideas on delivery).

Topic: The theory of uncanny pedagogies and how one online course is attempting to use technology to promote discomforted learning.

Rough outline
Intro.
1 What is uncanny learning and where does the theory come from. Drawing on work by Bayne, Usher and McWilliam. Also relate to early reading (Gains and losses: New forms of texts, knowledge, and learning – Gunther Kress) about the reflective power of images over words and imagery in Norman?s ?Machines that make us smart?.
2 Why is discomfort learning a good thing drawing on the above and the theories of reflective learning in Socrates?

Main sections:
1 Outline of the course inc technologies used.
2 How each can be said to take learners out of their comfort zone.
3 Additional methods that could be engaged.
4 How far is ‘too far’ – when does discomfort lead to an inability to learn?

Conclusion:
1 Is uncanny learning a valid theory relating to my experience and empirical evidence? Has the course succeed in generating this type of education. Is there any way it can be taken forward? Possibly include a quick twitter poll of other learners about how they feel it has worked for them? Will need to confirm feasibility of this idea!

Method of delivery.
Use multiple technologies grouped together in a single place i.e. Wallwisher or a web page so that it can be navigated in different orders. Use tumblr, vlog, prezi, PDF with hyperlinks etc. Try to make it as structure free as possible; however there probably does need to be an intro at the beginning and a conclusion at the end otherwise it may be too disjointed to work coherently. I would like it to reflect the strange nature of our learning experience.

Additional Marking criteria:

Does the work truly represent the uncanny nature of the subject, or is it too disjointed to adequately function as an academic piece of work?

Jen’s response

“I love the idea of focusing your final assignment on the structure and pedagogies of the EDC course itself. Your suggested format sounds like it would fit perfectly with the themes that you want to explore. The main thing that would concern me is that you may find it difficult to be critical in the context of a course that you’re in the middle of and an assignment that the course creators will be marking! However, I see that you are explicitly building in places to talk about the implications and possible problems with uncanny pedagogical approaches, so if you can hang on to that aspect, then I think it should work well.”

Do you mind if I quote you on that..?

Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009

I am still working through the possibilities for my assignment, and they are still very much in a state of flux. However I think that I will probably be drawing on some comments made by other course members and therefore I think it is only polite (and probably ethical) to ask if anyone minds being quoted in my assessment?

Which quotes I intend to use has not been decided yet, but it could include blog and twitter comments so if anyone minds me using their words, please let me know.