<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Assignment Thoughts &#8211; the current (draft plan)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalculture-ed.net/nicolao/2009/12/03/assignment-thoughts-the-current-draft-plan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalculture-ed.net/nicolao/2009/12/03/assignment-thoughts-the-current-draft-plan/</link>
	<description>Part of the MSc in E-learning at the University of Edinburgh</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 20:49:57 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nicola Osborne</title>
		<link>http://digitalculture-ed.net/nicolao/2009/12/03/assignment-thoughts-the-current-draft-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicola Osborne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalculture-ed.net/nicolao/?p=238#comment-116</guid>
		<description>This is a rather belated announcement but my assignment is now live (it has been for over a week in fact!):

&lt;a href=&quot;http://sites.google.com/site/uncannyinterventions/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://sites.google.com/site/uncannyinterventions/&lt;/a&gt;

Please do have a look and let me know what you think. I am fairly happy with it even if it&#039;s not exactly what I envisioned at the outset.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a rather belated announcement but my assignment is now live (it has been for over a week in fact!):</p>
<p><a href="http://sites.google.com/site/uncannyinterventions/" rel="nofollow">http://sites.google.com/site/uncannyinterventions/</a></p>
<p>Please do have a look and let me know what you think. I am fairly happy with it even if it&#8217;s not exactly what I envisioned at the outset.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicola&#39;s E-learning and Digital Cultures Blog &#187; Week 11 – Lights down, Chest out, Jazz Hands!</title>
		<link>http://digitalculture-ed.net/nicolao/2009/12/03/assignment-thoughts-the-current-draft-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicola&#39;s E-learning and Digital Cultures Blog &#187; Week 11 – Lights down, Chest out, Jazz Hands!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 01:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalculture-ed.net/nicolao/?p=238#comment-88</guid>
		<description>[...] over Skype early this week to firm up my assignment topic so I wanted to talk a little about why the assignment idea I posted this week started to emerge for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] over Skype early this week to firm up my assignment topic so I wanted to talk a little about why the assignment idea I posted this week started to emerge for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien DeBarra</title>
		<link>http://digitalculture-ed.net/nicolao/2009/12/03/assignment-thoughts-the-current-draft-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien DeBarra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 14:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalculture-ed.net/nicolao/?p=238#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Very interesting choice of subject. Will be very curious to read this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting choice of subject. Will be very curious to read this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nicola Osborne</title>
		<link>http://digitalculture-ed.net/nicolao/2009/12/03/assignment-thoughts-the-current-draft-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicola Osborne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 23:50:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalculture-ed.net/nicolao/?p=238#comment-79</guid>
		<description>Thank you for all your comments so far - all really interesting and positive so I&#039;m now excited to go exploring and pulling together ideas and experiences into a fun assignment. Will post more here as things progress...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for all your comments so far &#8211; all really interesting and positive so I&#8217;m now excited to go exploring and pulling together ideas and experiences into a fun assignment. Will post more here as things progress&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sibyller</title>
		<link>http://digitalculture-ed.net/nicolao/2009/12/03/assignment-thoughts-the-current-draft-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>sibyller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalculture-ed.net/nicolao/?p=238#comment-76</guid>
		<description>Nicola, I think this is a very interesting topic. People do react very differently to these &quot;prompts&quot;. I was discussing recently how people felt about amazon offering books like &quot;If you liked this book, you might also like...&quot;. While I always ignore these remarks and they don&#039;t particularly bother me, other people felt annoyed, but some also felt quite happy about having other books recommended. 
I think problems arise when the prompts aren&#039;t explicitly recognised as marketing strategies, as in Lesley&#039;s ethnography about the coffee website.
So I think the more subtle aspects are definitely worth investigating.
Good luck with the essay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicola, I think this is a very interesting topic. People do react very differently to these &#8220;prompts&#8221;. I was discussing recently how people felt about amazon offering books like &#8220;If you liked this book, you might also like&#8230;&#8221;. While I always ignore these remarks and they don&#8217;t particularly bother me, other people felt annoyed, but some also felt quite happy about having other books recommended.<br />
I think problems arise when the prompts aren&#8217;t explicitly recognised as marketing strategies, as in Lesley&#8217;s ethnography about the coffee website.<br />
So I think the more subtle aspects are definitely worth investigating.<br />
Good luck with the essay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Harris</title>
		<link>http://digitalculture-ed.net/nicolao/2009/12/03/assignment-thoughts-the-current-draft-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-75</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalculture-ed.net/nicolao/?p=238#comment-75</guid>
		<description>my observation of interventions of computers in social space I use:

- playing 4-handed card games on line, when someone quits a computer takes their seat.  This usually results in all the humans leaving; seems they prefer to play 4-on-4 human than with a bot

- continual paranoia in online poker circles that &quot;bots&quot; will infest the game and make them unprofitable

- on a personal note I&#039;m hassled by Facebook telling me to connect with people who i meet frequently in the flesh.  The fact they have no way to quantify your non-electronic contact is heartening at least...

- a fun one might be human-computer interaction on support chat logs where the company side is a bot reacting to the user&#039;s error issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my observation of interventions of computers in social space I use:</p>
<p>- playing 4-handed card games on line, when someone quits a computer takes their seat.  This usually results in all the humans leaving; seems they prefer to play 4-on-4 human than with a bot</p>
<p>- continual paranoia in online poker circles that &#8220;bots&#8221; will infest the game and make them unprofitable</p>
<p>- on a personal note I&#8217;m hassled by Facebook telling me to connect with people who i meet frequently in the flesh.  The fact they have no way to quantify your non-electronic contact is heartening at least&#8230;</p>
<p>- a fun one might be human-computer interaction on support chat logs where the company side is a bot reacting to the user&#8217;s error issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RIchard M. Davis</title>
		<link>http://digitalculture-ed.net/nicolao/2009/12/03/assignment-thoughts-the-current-draft-plan/comment-page-1/#comment-74</link>
		<dc:creator>RIchard M. Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 10:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://digitalculture-ed.net/nicolao/?p=238#comment-74</guid>
		<description>Hi N

Nice to have some excuse to feed the brain on a miserable Thursday morning!

I notice some people get quite irate about explicit machine interventions (&quot;people with this book/friend/paper also did x&quot;) while conveniently overlooking the fact that the whole environment is an intervention that enables them to do with ease something impossible only a few years ago. So there seems to be an issue around perception of control and choice, and the explicit role of the machine: when it is seamless and unobtrusive, we like it, when it isn&#039;t we don&#039;t.

Amazon/Facebook automated interventions clearly don&#039;t pass the Turing test: when they pop up we /know/ they are machine events pretending to be human and chatty and tend to react adversely. If you/I/Hamish say to each other &#039;check out this other book or person&#039; we&#039;ll probably do it with good grace rather than ill. And yet interesting that so much JISC IE type work is focused on bringing the same &#039;suggestive&#039; features to bear on academic researchers and resources.

I haven&#039;t delved into the unheimlich for a long time, but the osmotic/subconscious aspect of online social interaction with Twitter/FB/VLEs seems rich for exploration (perhaps you&#039;ve been doing that on the course?) - all this background knowledge we pick up about the lives of our online contacts. This seems to be something that non-users, notably older generations and commentators on Twitter ;) find particularly difficult to comprehend.

One other thought is that there seem to be interesting overlaps between what I understand of post-human thinking and some distributed-cognition concepts, eg. &quot;cognitive technology [extends] the scope and power of cognition&quot; (Dror &amp; Harnad - http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/16602/4/distribcog.htm)

Look forward to seeing your assignment in the MsCEL gallery :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi N</p>
<p>Nice to have some excuse to feed the brain on a miserable Thursday morning!</p>
<p>I notice some people get quite irate about explicit machine interventions (&#8221;people with this book/friend/paper also did x&#8221;) while conveniently overlooking the fact that the whole environment is an intervention that enables them to do with ease something impossible only a few years ago. So there seems to be an issue around perception of control and choice, and the explicit role of the machine: when it is seamless and unobtrusive, we like it, when it isn&#8217;t we don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Amazon/Facebook automated interventions clearly don&#8217;t pass the Turing test: when they pop up we /know/ they are machine events pretending to be human and chatty and tend to react adversely. If you/I/Hamish say to each other &#8216;check out this other book or person&#8217; we&#8217;ll probably do it with good grace rather than ill. And yet interesting that so much JISC IE type work is focused on bringing the same &#8217;suggestive&#8217; features to bear on academic researchers and resources.</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t delved into the unheimlich for a long time, but the osmotic/subconscious aspect of online social interaction with Twitter/FB/VLEs seems rich for exploration (perhaps you&#8217;ve been doing that on the course?) &#8211; all this background knowledge we pick up about the lives of our online contacts. This seems to be something that non-users, notably older generations and commentators on Twitter <img src='http://digitalculture-ed.net/nicolao/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  find particularly difficult to comprehend.</p>
<p>One other thought is that there seem to be interesting overlaps between what I understand of post-human thinking and some distributed-cognition concepts, eg. &#8220;cognitive technology [extends] the scope and power of cognition&#8221; (Dror &amp; Harnad &#8211; <a href="http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/16602/4/distribcog.htm)" rel="nofollow">http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/16602/4/distribcog.htm)</a></p>
<p>Look forward to seeing your assignment in the MsCEL gallery <img src='http://digitalculture-ed.net/nicolao/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

